Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems to Adversarial Multimodal Queries

Authors: Assignee Research;

Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems to Adversarial Multimodal Queries

Abstract

This report synthesises findings from 8 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How robust are RAG systems to adversarial or out-of-distribution queries in multimodal settings (e.g., image+text benchmarks like VCR) when evaluated using metrics like BLEU or CHRF. 6 claims were extracted from source literature; 6 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 9.3/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How robust are RAG systems to adversarial or out-of-distribution queries in multimodal settings (e.g., image+text benchmarks like VCR) when evaluated using metrics like BLEU or CHRF?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 9.3/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback