The Human Sovereignty Technology Paradigm — Supplement Version 2.0: Extended Prior Art Declaration
The Human Sovereignty Technology Paradigm — Supplement Version 2.0: Extended Prior Art Declaration
Supplement Version 2.0 to the Human Sovereignty Technology Paradigm white paper (Version 1.0, March 29, 2026 — zenodo.org/records/19323816). Establishes irrevocable public domain prior art for the Human Sovereignty Technology Platform (USPTO Provisional Application No. 64/020,809, filed March 29, 2026). Extends prior art coverage to: no-biometric embodiments of the Operator-Bound Technology Principle; third-party wearable device compatibility including commercially available smartwatches and fitness rings; CEEP capacitive electrode architecture for data destruction; modular replacement architecture with cryptographic module authentication; AI federated learning threat assessment protocol; multi-mode non-biometric trigger subsystem; passive safe-discharge adapter; and extended application embodiments covering financial systems, weapon authentication, child protection, medical systems, journalism, and legal profession source protection. All concepts herein are irrevocably dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0 Universal as of June 3, 2026. Constitutes published prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1). Cannot be retroactively classified after this publication date.
second amendment, Human Rights/trends, Human Rights Abuses/ethics, operator-bound technology, PPG authentication, human rights technology, aclu, operator security, data impermanence, Constitutional law, anti-surveillance, Human rights, Public domain, emergency data sanitization, Human rights violations, Human Rights/methods, human sovereignty, vehicle authentication, session data impermanence, voter privacy, Human Rights Abuses/psychology, operator authentication, Human Rights/ethics, no-biometric authentication, emergency destruction, physiological liveness, Human Rights Abuses, Human Rights/classification, data sovereignty, dead man switch, wearable liveness verification, storageless computing, cryptographic key destruction, Braydon Kershner, Patent, Regional human rights, field deployable, privacy technology, data destruction, Human Rights, Human Rights Abuses/economics, Human Rights Abuses/ethnology, wearable liveness, CEEP electrode, portable security device, modular replacement, press freedom, constitutional rights, Human Rights Abuses/history, data privacy, Human Rights/history, Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence, patent pending, Human Rights Abuses/classification, electoral security, cryptographic succession, Human Rights/standards, Human rights law, prior art, verification, smartwatch integration, selective destruction
second amendment, Human Rights/trends, Human Rights Abuses/ethics, operator-bound technology, PPG authentication, human rights technology, aclu, operator security, data impermanence, Constitutional law, anti-surveillance, Human rights, Public domain, emergency data sanitization, Human rights violations, Human Rights/methods, human sovereignty, vehicle authentication, session data impermanence, voter privacy, Human Rights Abuses/psychology, operator authentication, Human Rights/ethics, no-biometric authentication, emergency destruction, physiological liveness, Human Rights Abuses, Human Rights/classification, data sovereignty, dead man switch, wearable liveness verification, storageless computing, cryptographic key destruction, Braydon Kershner, Patent, Regional human rights, field deployable, privacy technology, data destruction, Human Rights, Human Rights Abuses/economics, Human Rights Abuses/ethnology, wearable liveness, CEEP electrode, portable security device, modular replacement, press freedom, constitutional rights, Human Rights Abuses/history, data privacy, Human Rights/history, Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence, patent pending, Human Rights Abuses/classification, electoral security, cryptographic succession, Human Rights/standards, Human rights law, prior art, verification, smartwatch integration, selective destruction
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!