Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Continuity Frames and the Machinery Fallacy: A Material-Oscillator Reinterpretation of Relativistic Clock Experiments

Authors: Khan, Alim ul haq;

Continuity Frames and the Machinery Fallacy: A Material-Oscillator Reinterpretation of Relativistic Clock Experiments

Abstract

This record contains Version 3.0 of the manuscript “Continuity Frames and the Machinery Fallacy: A Material-Oscillator Reinterpretation of Relativistic Clock Experiments” and its supplementary computational materials. The manuscript argues that relativistic clock experiments confirm real clock-rate differences, but do not by themselves uniquely establish temporal substantivalism. It develops a material-oscillator interpretation in which atomic clocks are treated as path-integrating physical oscillators whose accumulated readings encode gravitational and kinematic exposure histories. The supplementary ZIP contains three Google Colab computational demonstrations and their final results archives: S1 — Atomic Clock Swap Test S2 — Atomic Clock Adversarial Multi-Path Test S3 — GPS Clock Epoch Drift and Cancellation Test These demonstrations reproduce standard weak-field relativistic clock-rate calculations and illustrate path-history integration. They do not claim to experimentally disprove General Relativity or introduce a new weak-field empirical prediction. Their role is to support the manuscript’s measurement-ontology and ontological-underdetermination argument.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback