Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Quantum Graph Emergent Field Theory (QGEFT) Part I: Emergent Gravity, Computational Time, and Cosmological Natural Selection

Authors: Cohen, Yaniv;

Quantum Graph Emergent Field Theory (QGEFT) Part I: Emergent Gravity, Computational Time, and Cosmological Natural Selection

Abstract

The current Paper 48 benchmark does not claim that full continuum Einstein gravity, literal baby-universe black-hole reproduction, or a complete cosmological solution have already been derived from first principles inside QGEFT. It does show that the repository now contains a concrete computational unification of three cosmological pillars. The verified Paper 43 gravity benchmark resolves an inward-bending geodesic `46 -> 40 -> 34 -> 84 -> 78 -> 108` with closest approach `= 1` hop to mass node `0` and inward deflection `= 2` hops, supporting gravity as topological geodesic relaxation. The validated multiverse benchmark then shows that whole-universe law-space evolution is non-flat: the strongest winner appears in generation `1` with fitness `3.4181`, spectral dimension `d_s ≈ 2.1363`, and maximum degree `16`, while the engine itself advances through an explicit sweep clock of `20` burn-in sweeps plus `10` measurement sweeps. The defensible conclusion is therefore that QGEFT can already encode gravity, computational time, and cosmological natural selection as different observables of one optimizing graph substrate.

Keywords

Quantum Gravity, Lattice Field Theory, Monte Carlo Simulation, High Energy Physics, Emergent Spacetime

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!