Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Memory Consumption Patterns of LightGCL, SGL, and GCA on Large-Scale Graphs

Authors: Assignee Research;

Memory Consumption Patterns of LightGCL, SGL, and GCA on Large-Scale Graphs

Abstract

This report synthesises findings from 1 peer-reviewed paper addressing the following research question: How do the memory consumption patterns of LightGCL, SGL, and GCA differ during training on graphs scaling from 1 million to 20 million nodes. 13 claims were extracted from source literature; 11 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 7.7/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How do the memory consumption patterns of LightGCL, SGL, and GCA differ during training on graphs scaling from 1 million to 20 million nodes?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 7.7/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback