Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Risk-Aware Range and Position Sizing for CLMM Agents

Authors: Dogukan Ali Gundogan;

Risk-Aware Range and Position Sizing for CLMM Agents

Abstract

Concentrated-liquidity pools (e.g. Merchant Moe's incentivized mETH/USDe ranges) reward tight bands but punish them with impermanent loss and out-of-range idle capital when volatility spikes, making range width and position size a hard online decision for an agent. Current bots use fixed heuristics rather than volatility-aware sizing tied to a drawdown budget. A days-scale prototype can be measured on fee capture, time-in-range, max drawdown, and Sharpe-like risk-adjusted return against a passive wide-range LP.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback