This report synthesises findings from 9 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does adversarial contrastive learning with few-shot prompting affect pass@1 and pass@k scores on HumanEval compared to standard adversarial training for code generation models. 16 claims were extracted from source literature; 14 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.2/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How does adversarial contrastive learning with few-shot prompting affect pass@1 and pass@k scores on HumanEval compared to standard adversarial training for code generation models?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.2/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.