Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Subterranean Controls on Coastal and Upland Environmental Systems in South Devon

Authors: Williams, Benjamin;

Subterranean Controls on Coastal and Upland Environmental Systems in South Devon

Abstract

This monograph tests the hypothesis that ecological variance across South Devon is primarily governed by geological basement, with Torquay and the English Riviera Global Geopark forming the coastal carbonate-red-bed end member and Dartmoor National Park forming the upland granite-peat end member. The study synthesizes geomorphology, lithostratigraphy, hydrology, soil science, marine ecology, upland conservation, and climate-risk analysis across a transect extending from Tor Bay's sheltered littoral zone to the exposed Dartmoor massif. The methodology is comparative and systems-based: published geological mapping, cave and tor geomorphology, protected-area documentation, marine conservation designations, habitat inventories, peatland restoration studies, and field-observable diagnostic criteria are integrated into a single interpretive framework. Torquay is treated as a coastal basin where Devonian reef limestones, slates, Permian red beds, and Quaternary karst archives generate alkaline soils, erosional cliff niches, cave sediment records, and biologically rich shore-platform and seagrass systems. Dartmoor is treated as an intrusive upland where Early Permian granite, boron-rich mineral assemblages, periglacial tor evolution, acidic soils, high rainfall, and peat-filled basins create a contrasting ecological regime of blanket bog, heathland, clitter lichen communities, clean headwater streams, and ancient Atlantic oakwood fragments. The analysis finds that geology is not a passive backdrop but an active environmental control. Bedrock chemistry regulates soil pH and nutrient availability; structural fabric governs hydrological pathways and erosion forms; topography changes rainfall interception and microclimate; and historic land use amplifies or suppresses the biological niches made possible by substrate. The Torquay coast supports high beta diversity in compressed gradients between limestone grassland, caves, intertidal reef, and sandy bay habitats, but is exposed to tourism, urban runoff, anchoring, and sea-level rise. Dartmoor supports specialized upland species and large hydrological carbon stores, but its condition depends on grazing intensity, peat rewetting, wildfire prevention, and climate-sensitive water balance. The central conclusion is that conservation planning must couple geodiversity with biodiversity, treating Torquay and Dartmoor as linked components of one South Devon environmental system rather than as isolated scenic landscapes. This integrated framing also defines practical monitoring priorities for resilient restoration, from cave sediments and seagrass beds to peat hydrology, grazing mosaics, river corridors, and future decades.

Keywords

Geography, Environmental Science, Geology, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, United Kingdom

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center