Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Strategic Autonomy and Self-Reliance in Vietnam’s Foreign Policy After the 14th National Congress – A Comparison with the Strategies of Middle Powers in the Context of Us-China Competition

Authors: Nguyen The Vinh;

Strategic Autonomy and Self-Reliance in Vietnam’s Foreign Policy After the 14th National Congress – A Comparison with the Strategies of Middle Powers in the Context of Us-China Competition

Abstract

The 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam (2026) added two breakthrough perspectives to the foreign policy line: “strategic autonomy” and “self-reliance.” These concepts not only inherit the tradition of “independence and self-reliance” but also represent a new development, consistent with the historical stature, culture, and new position of Vietnam after 40 years of Doi Moi. At the same time, they constitute a proactive response to the increasingly polarized international landscape dominated by US-China strategic competition. The Political Report of the 14th Congress affirms: “Strategic autonomy, self-reliance, self-confidence, and strong progress in the era of the nation’s rise” (Communist Party of Vietnam, 2026, p. 1). The article provides an in-depth analysis of the new connotations of these two concepts through official documents, including the Political Report of the 14th Congress and the guidance document of the Party Committee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2026). Using a comparative approach, the article contrasts Vietnam’s application of “strategic autonomy” with the approaches of India (Strategic Autonomy), Indonesia (Bebas-Aktif), and Turkey in the context of US-China competition. On this basis, the study proposes the Vietnamese Strategic Autonomy Model (VSAM) consisting of four pillars and a Party-led multilateral diplomacy model. Through this model, the article evaluates the adaptability of “bamboo diplomacy” in an increasingly polarized international environment in which middle powers face pressure to choose sides or be drawn into alliance blocs. The research results indicate that although Vietnam’s model demonstrates greater flexibility and resilience than some other cases, it still faces major challenges concerning endogenous capacity, economic-political risks, and technological pressure. The article concludes that strengthening comprehensive self-reliance will determine the practical effectiveness of strategic autonomy in the coming period and proposes the Party-led multilateral diplomacy model as an optimal institutional framework for Vietnam.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Strategic autonomy, self-reliance, Vietnam's foreign policy, 14th National Congress, bamboo diplomacy, middle powers, US-China competition, VSAM model, multilateral diplomacy.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green