This report synthesises findings from 1 peer-reviewed paper addressing the following research question: How do multimodal reasoning benchmarks compare the adversarial robustness of graph contrastive learning and vision-language contrastive models when evaluated under varying levels of input. Deep learning has shown significant value in automating radiological diagnostics but can be limited by a lack of generalizability to external datasets. Leveraging the geometric principles of non-Euclidean space, certain geometric deep learning approaches may offer an alternative. 6 claims were extracted from source literature; 5 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.1/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How do multimodal reasoning benchmarks compare the adversarial robustness of graph contrastive learning and vision-language contrastive models when evaluated under varying levels of input perturbations?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.1/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.