Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Multi-View vs. Single-View Graph Anomaly Detection: Scalability and Efficiency at Scale

Authors: Assignee Research;

Multi-View vs. Single-View Graph Anomaly Detection: Scalability and Efficiency at Scale

Abstract

This report synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How do multi-view graph anomaly detection models scale in terms of inference efficiency compared to single-view methods when processing large-scale perturbed graphs, as measured by throughput and. Deep convolutional neural networks have performed remarkably well on many Computer Vision tasks. However, these networks are heavily reliant on big data to avoid overfitting. 10 claims were extracted from source literature; 10 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.8/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How do multi-view graph anomaly detection models scale in terms of inference efficiency compared to single-view methods when processing large-scale perturbed graphs, as measured by throughput and latency?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.8/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback