Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

VOT Empirical Layer Boundary Note: Ω-Centered Validation Not Currently Supported

Authors: Aizawa, Hiroaki;

VOT Empirical Layer Boundary Note: Ω-Centered Validation Not Currently Supported

Abstract

This record is a methodological boundary note / negative-result note for the VOT / Ω empirical layer. It is not an empirical validation result, not a replacement for Minimal Control Protocol V1, and not a claim that the full theoretical framework is disproven. The note summarizes the current boundary of the VOT empirical layer after recent internal exploratory and review work. In the broad exploratory atlas, 15 domains were inspected, 8 usable datasets were found, 7 domains were skipped, 129,360 specifications were tested, and 87,416 specifications were valid under the atlas filters. However, the top freeze candidates did not survive independence review. The freeze review examined 10 top candidates: 7 were classified as direct circular, 3 as near-circular, and 0 safe freeze candidates were selected. These results do not validate a new empirical claim. They support a methodological boundary decision: the Ω-centered empirical layer is not currently validated and should not be expanded as the active empirical core. Existing Minimal Control Protocol V1 remains historical, fixed, and Ω-centered. This note does not silently rewrite or invalidate V1 records. The active vNext direction is structural-channel concentration under fixed independent event labels, with Ω retained only as an optional composite or interaction diagnostic. Future empirical work requires independent event labels, frozen specifications, anti-circularity review, sufficient support counts, and validation before any public empirical claim.

Keywords

VOT; Ω framework; structural concentration; negative result; methodological boundary; anti-circularity; empirical validation; independent event labels

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green