Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Code Property Graph Fidelity and GCN-Based False Positive Prediction Accuracy in SAST Tools

Authors: Assignee Research;

Code Property Graph Fidelity and GCN-Based False Positive Prediction Accuracy in SAST Tools

Abstract

This report synthesises findings from 5 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: What is the correlation between Code Property Graph representation fidelity and the classification accuracy of GCN-based false positive predictors across diverse SAST tools. Software vulnerabilities pose significant security challenges and potential risks to society, necessitating extensive efforts in automated vulnerability detection. There are two popular lines of work to address automated vulnerability detection. 5 claims were extracted from source literature; 5 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.7/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: What is the correlation between Code Property Graph representation fidelity and the classification accuracy of GCN-based false positive predictors across diverse SAST tools?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.7/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback