Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Baichuan-2 Fine-Tuning on Legal and Biomedical Data: TruthfulQA and HellaSwag Performance

Authors: Assignee Research;

Baichuan-2 Fine-Tuning on Legal and Biomedical Data: TruthfulQA and HellaSwag Performance

Abstract

This report synthesises findings from 14 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the fine-tuning of Baichuan-2 on in-domain legal datasets compare to biomedical datasets in terms of TruthfulQA alignment scores and reasoning accuracy on the HellaSwag benchmark. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a broad spectrum of tasks. They have attracted significant attention and been deployed in numerous downstream applications. 7 claims were extracted from source literature; 7 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.0/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How does the fine-tuning of Baichuan-2 on in-domain legal datasets compare to biomedical datasets in terms of TruthfulQA alignment scores and reasoning accuracy on the HellaSwag benchmark?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.0/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback