
This article provides a comparative legal analysis of copyright disputes from two primary legal foundations - contractual and non-contractual (tort) relations. The study is grounded in the Civil Code of Uzbekistan, the Law “On Copyright and Related Rights,” the Law “On Mediation,” the 2023 Plenary Resolution of the Supreme Court, and relevant international instruments. Academic literature available in the TSUL (Tashkent State University of Law) Library is incorporated into the analysis. The article examines the origins, legal nature, burden of proof, liability forms, the role of mediation, procedural distinctions, and the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) model comparatively. Three systemic deficiencies in current legislation are identified, and scientifically grounded proposals are developed.
copyright, contractual dispute, tort, non-contractual dispute, licensing agreement, mediation, alternative dispute resolution, DMCA, procedural law, intellectual property.
copyright, contractual dispute, tort, non-contractual dispute, licensing agreement, mediation, alternative dispute resolution, DMCA, procedural law, intellectual property.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
