
Background:The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, requiring adaptive leadership, coordination, and resilience. In Region Östergötland, a Regional Special Healthcare Management structure was established to manage the crisis. Objective:To describe the methodological and theoretical framework used to evaluate the management of the COVID-19 pandemic within the Regional Special Healthcare Management organization in Region Östergötland. Results:The report presents a multi-method evaluation approach combining qualitative and quantitative data sources, including observations, document analysis, interviews, focus groups, and surveys. Key analytical frameworks include resilience theory, situational awareness, sensemaking, and command and coordination processes. The study emphasizes the importance of a multi-level and multi-theoretical approach to understanding complex crisis management. It identifies challenges in data reliability, causal attribution, and the dynamic and prolonged nature of the pandemic. Analytical tools such as thematic analysis, content analysis, and resilience assessment models are proposed to capture organizational performance and adaptive capacities. Conclusion:A comprehensive, multi-method, and theory-informed approach is necessary to evaluate complex healthcare crisis management. The proposed framework enables a deeper understanding of organizational resilience, leadership, and decision-making processes, supporting future improvements in preparedness and crisis response.
Emergency Medical Services, (MeSH) Emergency Medical Services, (MeSH) Disaster Planning, Decision Making, (MeSH) Decision Making, (MeSH) COVID-19, (MeSH) Program Evaluation, COVID-19, Disaster Planning, Pandemics, (MeSH) Pandemics, Program Evaluation
Emergency Medical Services, (MeSH) Emergency Medical Services, (MeSH) Disaster Planning, Decision Making, (MeSH) Decision Making, (MeSH) COVID-19, (MeSH) Program Evaluation, COVID-19, Disaster Planning, Pandemics, (MeSH) Pandemics, Program Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
