Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Foundation model evaluation study MMLU HellaSwag ARC WinoGrande TruthfulQA scores

Authors: SOVEREIGN Research Kernel;

Foundation model evaluation study MMLU HellaSwag ARC WinoGrande TruthfulQA scores

Abstract

Recent advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies have been driven at an unprecedented pace by the development of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, challenges remain, such as generating responses that are misaligned with the intent of the question or producing incorrect answers. This paper analyzes various Prompt Engineering techniques for large-scale language models and identifies methods that can optimize response performance across different datasets without the need for extensive retraining or fine-tuning. In particular, we examine prominent Prompt Engineering techResearch goal: Foundation model evaluation study MMLU HellaSwag ARC WinoGrande TruthfulQA scoresAutonomous synthesis report generated by SOVEREIGN Research Kernel. Tribunal consensus score: 7.8/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback