
This document is a peer review report that summarizes the editorial and review process of a submission to Replication Research. It provides information on the context of the submission and documents all stages of editorial decision-making, including the desk decision, the initial editorial check, the first decision and accompanying reviews, and (if applicable) further decisions, accompanying reviews, the final decision, and a note on the reproducibility check. The review report is written by the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Assistant. Reviewers are listed in alphabetical order. The structure of this review report is adapted from the review reports published by Meta-Psychology (see https://osf.io/hxm2v/files/9cf7g).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
