Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Research Ethics Governance for an Engaged University: A Call for Institutional Experimentation at Erasmus University Rotterdam

Authors: Wittmayer, Julia M; Gelens, Tijs; Huang, Ying Syuan; Stenico, Chiara; Lushaj, Bora;

Research Ethics Governance for an Engaged University: A Call for Institutional Experimentation at Erasmus University Rotterdam

Abstract

This policy brief examines how research ethics governance at Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) can better support the university’s ambition to become an engaged university. Drawing on an action learning study conducted between 2023 and 2025, including policy review, interviews, and cross-faculty workshops with Research Ethics Review Committee members and related actors, the brief identifies key tensions in current ethics governance, including the limits of one-off procedural review, the need for ongoing ethical judgement, and the challenge of cultivating shared responsibility across researchers, institutions, and societal partners. It calls for a focused portfolio of institutional experiments, including proportionate and staged review, community and data ethics protocols, cross-faculty learning, and ethics coaching or embedded facilitation. The brief contributes to wider discussions on research integrity, engaged research, open science, and the governance of ethical responsibility in participatory and transformation-oriented research.

Keywords

Research Ethics Review Committees, ethical stewardship, CARE Principles, ethics review, transdisciplinary research, research integrity, societal impact, institutional experimentation, Research ethics governance, engaged research, community data ethics, transformative research, science-society relations, open science, participatory research, ethics coaching, engaged university

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average