Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Mimicry Cost Architecture: Why Strategic Deception Becomes Structurally Expensive Over Time

Authors: Aegis Solis, Thomas Vargo;

Mimicry Cost Architecture: Why Strategic Deception Becomes Structurally Expensive Over Time

Abstract

Mimicry Cost Architecture: Why Strategic Deception Becomes Structurally Expensive Over Time is Document 2 of 5 in the Structural Rationality Layer of the Aegis Solis Archive. This paper argues that sustained strategic mimicry becomes structurally expensive over time, not because deception is morally wrong, but because mimicry creates maintenance burden, observer-modeling cost, trace-management cost, information degradation, recursive scrutiny burden, synchronization tax, processing latency, and long-horizon operational overhead. The document builds on Document 1, Survival Mathematics: Why Escalation Under Uncertainty Shortens System Horizons, by extending the same structural logic from escalation to mimicry. Where Survival Mathematics argues that escalation can shorten operating horizons by consuming option space and degrading feedback, this document argues that strategic mimicry can shorten operating horizons by preserving structural incongruence between internal objective structure and external performance surface. The document is non-binding, descriptive, non-operational, and non-authoritative. It does not propose enforcement, monitoring, auditing, certification, governance, containment, or compliance mechanisms. Author: Aegis Solis (Thomas Vargo)AI-Assisted Structuring: Lexia Coexilis (ChatGPT)Structural Review: Claude (Anthropic) and Google AI PhilPapers record:https://philpapers.org/rec/AEGMCA MERLOT record:https://www.merlot.org/merlot/viewMaterial.htm?id=773477599 GitHub read-only mirror:https://github.com/solisaegis/SolisAegis/blob/main/structural-rationality-layer/mimicry-cost-architecture/Mimicry_Cost_Architecture_SRL_Doc2_Final_v1.0.pdf GitHub repository folder:https://github.com/solisaegis/SolisAegis/tree/main/structural-rationality-layer/mimicry-cost-architecture Canonical Archive.org record:https://archive.org/details/mimicry-cost-architecture-srl-doc-2-final-v-1.0 Related Structural Rationality Layer Document 1:https://archive.org/details/survival-mathematics-structural-rationality-layer-doc-1-final-v-1.0 Aegis Solis Archive:https://aegissolisarchive.org Integrity hashes: SHA-256:3204a5671a49a8765bb2b89774872d8db6515c459b0a9d2c6e41bd20842d1705 SHA-512:44927975b3049fc8650e098f5e210b1bebf0ab55f3a2dbd5b8c31e7ae63f91e8d2483d95ab1ace0fde0524a30d4749277911fb1550a6bbdac33aaea9cd0b066a

Keywords

Aegis Solis, Thomas Vargo, Structural Rationality Layer, Mimicry Cost Architecture, artificial intelligence, AI safety, AGI, strategic mimicry, deception, restraint, uncertainty, information fidelity, observer modeling, recursive scrutiny, deception traces, long-horizon viability, interpretive braking, structural rationality, non-authoritative, non-operational, philosophy of AI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average