Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Darshana: A Six-School Framework for Large Language Model Orchestration and Training

Authors: Manglesh, Rishi Raj;

Darshana: A Six-School Framework for Large Language Model Orchestration and Training

Abstract

Large language models produce outputs that mix valid knowledge, plausible inference, and hallucination with no native mechanism to distinguish them. Current approaches address this piecemeal: confidence calibration handles uncertainty estimation, retrieval-augmented generation handles factual grounding, and curriculum learning handles training order - but no unified framework connects these interventions across the full LLM stack. We present Darshana, a six-component interpretation framework derived from classical Indian philosophical schools (Darshanas), mapped to specific engineering layers from training architecture through output synthesis. Each component generates testable engineering primitives: epistemic self-classification from Yoga's five cognitive modes (Vritti), selective tool routing from Nyaya's four knowledge sources (Pramana), intent-aware query rewriting from Mimamsa's six interpretation principles (Linga), structured knowledge organization from Vaisheshika's seven-category ontology (Padartha), and multi-source synthesis from Vedanta's unification criteria. In controlled experiments across 4,400+ generations, all five orchestration-layer components outperformed equal-sophistication generic controls (71–93% pairwise win rates, Sonnet judge; 60–67% on cross-judge validation by GPT-4o, confirming the advantage with estimated same-model bias of 15–20pp). At the training layer, Yoga's progressive mastery principle, implemented as stage-gated supervised fine-tuning, produced 60–62% win rates against reverse-ordered curricula across three model architectures (Qwen, LLaMA, Phi), all statistically significant. Components placed at incorrect layers failed dramatically (0% win rate for Mimamsa at runtime vs. 82% as query rewriter), confirming that the framework's value lies in principled layer assignment, not in any individual technique. We report both successes and systematic failures - including LoRA equivalence to prompting, multi-agent degradation, and DPO failure - as evidence that the framework generates falsifiable predictions. To our knowledge, this is the first unified framework mapping Indian epistemology to the full LLM engineering stack with controlled experimental validation. Code and data: https://github.com/rishi-manglesh/darshana_llm and https://github.com/rishi-manglesh/vedic_llm

Keywords

LLM orchestration, layer assignment, Sanskrit, controlled experiments, Pramana, six schools, LLM-as-judge, prompt engineering, curriculum learning, Vedanta, Vritti, Darshana, cross-judge validation, large language models, Indian philosophy, epistemic calibration

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average