
Research software and its creators have long played a critical role in the advancement of research worldwide. This role is changing in the age of “generative AI” (GenAI), but both the software and the people remain of key importance. Understanding these changes is essential in enabling Research Software Engineers (RSEs) to continue contributing the same high value to the research process and its outputs. Before GenAI, the RSE movement had learned to clearly articulate the value proposition of embedding expert software engineering in research to its stakeholders. This blog post highlights how RSEs use GenAI to increase their capacity in both software engineering and research, and visualize this evolution. While GenAI is changing - perhaps considerably - how RSEs work in practice, their value and the value of their work for research remains steady and likely to increase.
Research, GenAI, Research software, Research software engineers
Research, GenAI, Research software, Research software engineers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
