
This working paper distinguishes metaphysical Simulation Theory from Practical Simulation Theory: a model-mediated account of how living beings perceive, remember, communicate, coordinate, and act through layered simulations arising from within reality. It argues that “fake” is the wrong frame; perception is modeled contact with reality, and the practical task is to govern models so they clarify reality rather than replace it. The essay develops a layered mediation arc from biology and perception through language, media, the internet, AI, and institutional consequence, then introduces model-hardening as a governance problem. This working paper is part of the broader PUTMAN / Spanda architectural framework for model mediation, weak-signal interpretation, and governed consequence.
Practical Simulation Theory, model mediation, Artificial intelligence, symbolic systems, predictive processing, media theory, Science and Technology Studies, AI governance, PUTMAN Model, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Science and technology studies, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, simulation theory, Modern philosophy, extended cognition, model-hardening, Spanda Framework
Practical Simulation Theory, model mediation, Artificial intelligence, symbolic systems, predictive processing, media theory, Science and Technology Studies, AI governance, PUTMAN Model, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Science and technology studies, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, simulation theory, Modern philosophy, extended cognition, model-hardening, Spanda Framework
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
