Youth food insecurity in the United States is one of the most consequential and preventable structural failures in the domestic social safety net. Despite sustained investment in federal nutrition programs across decades, the nation entered 2025 in a deteriorating position: 14.1 million children lacked reliable access to adequate food in 2024, with 18.4 percent of households with children experiencing food insecurity — a near return to post-recession levels of 2014, effectively erasing ten years of measurable progress (USDA Economic Research Service, 2025). This regression did not occur in a vacuum. It followed the deliberate wind-down of pandemic-era nutrition supports — the expanded Child Tax Credit, universal school meal waivers, and emergency SNAP increases — that had driven child food insecurity to a historic low of 6.2 percent in 2021. When those interventions expired, insecurity rates increased by nearly 50 percent within a single year (K-12 Dive, 2024). The policy signal was unmistakable: when nutrition infrastructure is strengthened, outcomes improve; when it is withdrawn, they deteriorate rapidly. The structural challenge is compounded by deep and persistent racial inequity. In 2024, Black, non-Hispanic households with children experienced food insecurity at a rate of 31 percent, more than three times the rate for non-Hispanic white households (10.1 percent). American Indian and Alaska Native households faced rates of 30.9 percent; Hispanic households, 20.2 percent (CBPP, 2026). These disparities are not incidental. They reflect the concentration of structural access barriers, program exclusions, and geographic food system failures in communities already subject to compounding disadvantage. This paper argues that youth food insecurity is fundamentally an infrastructure problem. It is not primarily caused by insufficient food production, nor is it solved by food donations alone. It is caused by the failure of interconnected systems of access, logistics, nutrition quality, and crisis resilience to function as integrated infrastructure for the communities they serve. Addressing it requires a corresponding shift in intervention philosophy: from episodic charitable response toward proactive, data-driven, technology-enabled infrastructure. This paper introduces and applies a systems-based framework: