
Gene drives raise biosecurity questions because their defining feature (inheritance bias) could enable genetic traits to spread through sexually reproducing populations over generations. This article examines how gene drive biosecurity differs from biosafety, focusing on dual-use concerns, unauthorised release, weak oversight, attribution challenges and potential misuse scenarios. It reviews examples discussed in the literature, including cross-border spread, agricultural disruption, altered disease-vector populations, informal or DIY research, and possible interference with ecosystems or food systems. The article also considers the biological, technical and ecological constraints that limit misuse potential, including organism-specific expertise, sexual reproduction, population structure and uncertainty in field performance. It discusses governance gaps, monitoring needs, detection tools and mitigation strategies, emphasising that biosecurity concerns should be assessed cautiously rather than treated as imminent threats. As a living literature review, this article will be updated as new evidence, capabilities and governance approaches emerge.
Biosecurity, Gene Drive Technology
Biosecurity, Gene Drive Technology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
