
The purpose of this study was to construct and validate a Friendship Quality Model in college students.Specifically, it was designed to find out the dimensions and indicators of quality friendship and to develop ameasure of friendship quality, and to test the reliability and validity of the proposed model. The study employeda quantitative research design with 300 college students from the University of Southeastern Philippines –Mintal Campus using convenience sampling technique. Data were collected using a five-point Likert scalestructured questionnaire which had 40 items. For data analyses and model validation, Exploratory FactorAnalysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used. Findings revealed five major dimensionsof friendship quality: (1) Trust, Support, and Collaborative Friendship; (2) Security, Respect, and Mutual Carein Friendship; (3) Reliability and Conflict Resolution; (4) Open Communication and Emotional Disclosure; and(5) Conflict and Communication Strain. The results of EFA showed that the total variance of the extractedfactors was 56.57% and CFA results showed that the two-factor model that had the best fit was "Trust, Support,Collaborative Friendship and Security", and "Respect, Mutual Care in Friendship". Goodness-of-fit indicesindicated that the final model demonstrated excellent fit and reliability. The study concluded that friendshipquality among college students is strongly influenced by trust, emotional support, respect, communication, andmutual care. The developed framework and instrument may serve as useful tools for educators, counselors, andresearchers in promoting students’ social and emotional well-being within higher education institutions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
