
This article analyzes the main stages of rulemaking (norm-making) activity based on the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Normative Legal Acts.” In particular, it examines the legal mechanisms for planning, initiating, drafting normative legal acts, conducting regulatory impact assessment, legal and anti-corruption expertise, public discussion, coordination, and adoption of normative legal acts. The article also highlights practical challenges arising at different stages of the rulemaking process and proposes directions for improving the effectiveness and quality of norm-making activities.
rulemaking, norm-making process, normative legal act, draft normative legal act, public discussion, legal expertise, anti-corruption expertise, regulatory impact assessment, legislation, legal regulation, lawmaking process.
rulemaking, norm-making process, normative legal act, draft normative legal act, public discussion, legal expertise, anti-corruption expertise, regulatory impact assessment, legislation, legal regulation, lawmaking process.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
