Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

GOVERNING AUTONOMOUS BUSINESS SYSTEMS: ETHICAL CHALLENGES AND RESPONSIBLE AI FRAMEWORKS

Authors: Sudalai Krishnan, Bandi Reshma Balaji, Chaitanya Mahesh Mhande & Kashish Rajiv Nishad;

GOVERNING AUTONOMOUS BUSINESS SYSTEMS: ETHICAL CHALLENGES AND RESPONSIBLE AI FRAMEWORKS

Abstract

The rapid shift toward Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business has created a “trust gap” where autonomous systems manage critical decisions—like hiring and lending—without enough human oversight. Current AI models often operate as “black boxes,” leading to risks like algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and failure to meet legal regulations. While organizations want the efficiency of AI, they often lack a structured way to manage these ethical risks. This study proposes a Multi-Layer Ethical Governance Framework designed to bridge this gap. Unlike existing methods that handle ethics and technical performance separately, our framework integrates them into one system. It uses five functional layers—Data Governance, Ethical Evaluation, Governance Monitoring, Explainability, and Human Oversight—to ensure AI decisions are fair, understandable, and legally compliant. We tested this approach using a real-world Credit Risk Assessment scenario. The results show that the framework successfully flags hidden biases and provides clear “reason codes” for AI decisions, allowing humans to step in and prevent errors. This research provides a scalable and practical roadmap for businesses to adopt AI responsibly, ensuring that technology remains a tool for progress rather than a source of unfairness

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green