Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

TDC ADMET benchmark snapshot (2026-03-24) used in Koleiev et al., 'Critical Assessment of ML models for ADMET Prediction in TDC leaderboards'

Authors: Yesylevskyy, Semen;

TDC ADMET benchmark snapshot (2026-03-24) used in Koleiev et al., 'Critical Assessment of ML models for ADMET Prediction in TDC leaderboards'

Abstract

TDC ADMET benchmark snapshot (2026-03-24) Description This is a frozen copy of the Therapeutics Data Commons ADMET benchmark group as it stood on 2026-03-24, downloaded with PyTDC 0.3.8. It contains all 22 endpoints, each as the official scaffold split returned by tdc.benchmark_group.admet_group. No resampling, filtering, or relabelling on our side. Motivation The public TDC benchmark isn't version-pinned, and the underlying data can change silently. Re-downloading through PyTDC at a later date may give you a different split, which makes results from older papers hard to reproduce. This deposit is the exact data we used in the paper below, so anyone who wants to reproduce or build on those results starts from the same place we did. Contents One subdirectory per endpoint, each with a train_val.csv and a test.csv: admet_group/ ├── / │ ├── train_val.csv │ └── test.csv ├── / │ ├── train_val.csv │ └── test.csv └── ... (22 endpoints total) Every CSV has three columns: Drug_ID — TDC compound identifier Drug — SMILES string Y — endpoint value (regression target or binary label, depending on the endpoint) How to use it To reproduce the standard TDC evaluation: run the multi-seed protocol (5 seeds) on train_val.csv and evaluate once on test.csv. The companion code repository at github.com/receptor-ai/tdc-admet-bench has a working example, plus the feature extraction, training, hyperparameter search, and third-party model wrappers (MapLight, MapLight+GNN, CaliciBoost) used in the paper. Associated paper Critical Assessment of ML Models for ADMET Prediction in TDC Leaderboards — Koleiev et al., Receptor.AI (2026). Preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.02.26.708193v1.full. License and integrity Released under CC BY 4.0, matching this deposit's metadata and the upstream TDC dataset licensing. Archive SHA-256: 8ac217bd8c316d04d15ab2ef5173ef6e9a084e156dfcd16c0ac21e2ed6e4590b.

Keywords

ADMET, benchmark, machine learning, Therapeutics Data Commons, reproducibility, TDC, drug discovery

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average