
This record contains raw data related to article "A machine learning model including pentraxin-3 as predictor of outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia." Abstract Background. The clinical diagnosis, severity assessment, and outcome prognostication of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remain challenging due to the complex disease pathophysiology. Accurate outcome prediction is crucial for optimizing patient management, reducing mortality, and minimizing hospital and ICU admissions. Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, 228 CAP patients with varying degrees of disease severity were assessed. Clinical and demographic data, along with multiple biomarker measurements, including pentraxin-3 (PTX3), were analysed longitudinally. The primary outcome was clinical failure. Results: Among the single parameters evaluated, the oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (SpO2/FiO2), PTX3, and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MRproADM) demonstrated the strongest predictive performance, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.799, 0.709, and 0.647, respectively. Machine learning (ML) experiments integrating multiple features identified the optimal algorithm for outcome prediction, combining these stand-alone markers at baseline and 72h. The optimal ML model achieved an AUC of 0.950 (95% CI: 0.83–0.96), recall of 92.6%, accuracy of 92.0%, and precision of 86.6%, representing a >15% AUC improvement over any individual biomarker. Conclusions: While SpO2/FiO2 remains the most reliable stand-alone prognostic marker, PTX3 demonstrated significant independent outcome predictive value. When integrated with other biomarkers using ML-based models, outcome prediction significantly improved, underscoring its potential for CAP patient management. Trial registration n°: NCT06491004 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
