Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING RESEARCH GAPS IN DEVOPS: TOWARD STANDARDIZED FRAMEWORKS, SECURITY INTEGRATION, AND ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS

Authors: Ms. Pramila .V. Bairagi;

IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING RESEARCH GAPS IN DEVOPS: TOWARD STANDARDIZED FRAMEWORKS, SECURITY INTEGRATION, AND ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS

Abstract

DevOps has become a central approach in contemporary software engineering, aiming to accelerate delivery cycles, enhance system reliability, and foster stronger collaboration between development and operations teams. However, despite its broad adoption, many organizations continue to experience inconsistent results, security shortcomings, and challenges in successful implementation. This study explores enduring research gaps in DevOps through the analysis of three closely connected areas: the absence of unified and standardized frameworks, the fragmented incorporation of security practices, and the limited attention given to organizational readiness. Using a survey-based research methodology supported by a critical review of existing literature, the study evaluates empirical insights gathered from DevOps practitioners across multiple industries in conjunction with prior academic research. The results indicate that current DevOps practices are predominantly driven by tools, security is unevenly integrated across the lifecycle, and organizational readiness remains insufficiently theorized and poorly operationalized. This research advances the field by conceptualizing DevOps as a socio-technical system and by outlining an integrative direction to inform future research and practical adoption. The study further discusses implications for theory building, organizational strategy, and the implementation of secure DevOps practices within post-pandemic, distributed work settings.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green