Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

PREPARING FOR A HUMAN–AI FUTURE: A HUMAN-CENTRIC FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATIVE READINESS

Authors: Ms. Maria Raja John;

PREPARING FOR A HUMAN–AI FUTURE: A HUMAN-CENTRIC FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATIVE READINESS

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence across organizational, educational, and societal domains has fundamentally reshaped how decisions are made, work is organized, and responsibilities are distributed. While AI systems offer unprecedented gains in speed, scale, and analytical capability, their real-world effectiveness is inseparable from the quality of human engagement that surrounds their design, interpretation, and use. This paper contends that preparedness for an AI-driven future cannot be reduced to technological readiness alone, but must be grounded in a human-centric understanding of collaboration between human intelligence and artificial systems. Using a qualitative and analytical research methodology based on a systematic review of interdisciplinary literature, the study integrates perspectives from information technology, social sciences, ethics, and workforce studies to examine how preparedness for human–AI collaboration is currently conceptualized. The analysis reveals that prevailing approaches disproportionately emphasize technical infrastructure and automation capacity, while insufficiently addressing the human competencies required to guide, question, and govern intelligent systems. In response, the paper proposes a Human-Centric Collaborative Readiness Framework structured around four interrelated dimensions: cognitive capability, emotional intelligence, ethical reasoning, and decision authority. These dimensions collectively capture the human capacities necessary to ensure that AI systems are used responsibly, transparently, and in alignment with societal values. By repositioning human intelligence as a central pillar of AI preparedness, the framework offers a structured lens for assessing individual and organizational readiness in AI-enabled environments. The study contributes to ongoing interdisciplinary discourse by advancing a conceptual model that emphasizes collaboration over replacement, responsibility over automation, and sustainability over short-term efficiency. The proposed framework is intended to support educators, organizations, and policymakers in designing strategies that ensure artificial intelligence strengthens human agency and institutional resilience in the evolving digital future

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average