Views provided by UsageCounts
FIGURE 3. Diagrammatic representation of Parachela claw structure and nomenclature. A. Exploded diagram of a parachelan claw to explain component parts. a—accessory spines; b—basal tract; l—lunule (edge may be smooth or dentate); p—primary branch; s—secondary branch. B. Stylised diagram of macrobitid claw (2112). Secondary branch—2; primary branch—1; primary branch—1; secondary branch—2. C. Stylised diagram of a hypsibid claw (2121). Secondary branch—2; primary branch—1; secondary branch—2; primary branch—1. D. Stylised diagram of: i—isohypsibid (basal section and secondary branch at right angles) and h—hypsibid (basal section and secondary branch forming continuous arc) claws. E. Stylised diagram of Eohypsibiidae-type claw—claws are clearly delineated by septa into basal section, secondary branch and primary branch.
Published as part of Marley, Nigel J., Mcinnes, Sandra J. & Sands, Chester J., 2011, Phylum Tardigrada: A re-evaluation of the Parachela, pp. 51-64 in Zootaxa 2819 on page 56, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.201757
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts