
The coupling α* = 1/(4 ln 2), fixed by Bekenstein–Hawking in P1 and used without recalibration to derive nine fermion masses (mean 2.4%, P2) and m_H/m_W = u⁵ (+0.73%, P3), is extended to the cosmological network. Six new predictions are established from α* alone: (i) δG/G = (c−b)/C(5,2) = 1.353% (Lamine et al. 2025: 0.001σ); (ii) a₀ = αcH₀/2 = 1.2002 × 10⁻¹⁰ m s⁻²; (iii) H₀^K₅ = 68.49 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ (DESI 2024: <0.02%); (iv) η^K₅ = 5.929 × 10⁻¹⁰ (−2.87% Planck); (v) a dark-matter acceleration law g_DM = (a₀/α) z e⁻ᶻ with z = α* x^γ(x) and γ = 1/2 + (1/|E(K₅)|) e^−√x, derived from the face-excitation ontology of P2–P3; (vi) a composition modulation and network smoothing whose six coefficients are all combinatorial invariants of K₅. The same α* has now traversed 61 orders of magnitude in length — from Planck-scale entropy to the Hubble horizon — without adjustment. No other framework predicts entries in more than one row of the master table. Result (v) surpasses the empirical MOND interpolation (χ̃² = 2.39 vs 2.82 on 171 SPARC galaxies, same degrees of freedom). Result (vi) reduces χ̃² to 2.11 (102/171 wins, 17% gap closure toward NFW); a sensitivity scan confirms that the composition coefficient c_comp = 3/10 = |F₃|/|E(K₅)| falls within the broad empirical minimum (Δχ̃² < 0.08). A uniqueness theorem establishes that K₅ is the only complete graph for which the face–edge exponent gap equals 1/|E| (Theorem VII.1). The companion verification script (105 tests, all PASS) provides a reproducible audit trail from axioms to predictions. Zero free parameters, 61 orders of magnitude, one coupling.
discrete geometry, quantum gravity, causal graph, SPARC, zero free parameters, pentachoron, dark matter
discrete geometry, quantum gravity, causal graph, SPARC, zero free parameters, pentachoron, dark matter
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
