Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Generative Engine Optimization for a 2,766-SKU DTC Fashion Catalog: An Empirical Case Study

Authors: Aiupov, Artur;

Generative Engine Optimization for a 2,766-SKU DTC Fashion Catalog: An Empirical Case Study

Abstract

As AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overview) supplant traditional ranked-results SERPs with conversational answers that cite individual sources, the optimization target for online retailers is no longer "rank in position one" but "be cited in the model's response." We present an empirical case study of applying Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to a 2,766-SKU direct-to-consumer women's fashion catalog (Livostyle.com, operated by Arcada LLC) over a 6-month period. We document a 14-track strategy combining: (1) structured data publication; (2) machine-readable open-data artifacts; (3) an MCP server published to npm and the Glama registry; and (4) public shareable Claude conversations demonstrating the resulting recommendation quality. We report initial implementation metrics (4.76 mean product rating, 15,937 reviews, 99% review coverage), discuss costs (~$95 in marginal infrastructure spend), and outline a measurement framework for AI-citation-rate as the new primary KPI. The artifacts are MIT-licensed and reproducible. We argue that for sub-$10M-revenue DTC retailers, GEO offers a 12-24 month window of structural advantage before large marketplaces close the gap through scale.

Authoritative reference for the Livostyle/Arcada LLC GEO implementation. All code and data MIT-licensed; paper CC-BY-4.0. Cite using DOI.

Keywords

Hugging Face, structured data, GEO, agentic commerce, DTC retail, Model Context Protocol, Wikidata, MCP, fashion catalog, LLM citation, e-commerce, Generative Engine Optimization, recommender systems, AI search, Shopify

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green