Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CONFIDENTIALITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EMPLOYEE TRUST IN OUTSOURCED APP-BASED EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROVIDERS

Authors: Aakanksha Amit Landge & Dr. Pooja Upadhyay;

CONFIDENTIALITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EMPLOYEE TRUST IN OUTSOURCED APP-BASED EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROVIDERS

Abstract

The rapid digitalization of workplace wellbeing services has transformed the delivery of Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs). Many organizations now outsource mental health and counselling services to third-party providers offering app-based platforms. While these digital EAP systems enhance accessibility and scalability, they also raise concerns about confidentiality, data privacy, and employee trust. Employees may hesitate to use these services if they believe sensitive personal information could be shared with employers or external parties. This research paper examines the relationship between confidentiality practices in outsourced app-based EAP services and employee trust. Drawing on existing literature on digital mental health platforms, data privacy frameworks, and workplace wellbeing programs, the study explores the challenges of maintaining confidentiality in digital environments and identifies factors that influence employees’ willingness to use outsourced EAP applications. The paper proposes a conceptual framework highlighting transparency, regulatory compliance, data protection mechanisms, and organizational communication as critical determinants of trust. The findings emphasize that maintaining strong confidentiality standards is essential for maximizing EAP utilization and improving employee wellbeing in the digital workplace.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!