Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Masquerading bots

Authors: Holland, Ralph Bruce;

Masquerading bots

Abstract

Introduction Large numbers of anonymous agents have been masquerading with browser strings [1] and walking the mediawiki farm metadata. On blocking the unwanted bot the number of IP addresses substantially increased. This lead to the postulate that there is probably an intersection between rejected bot IP addresses and these anonymous agent's IP addresses. Table A contains that intersection across more than 79 days, where the IP, CC and Original Bot agent string is listed only when there is a correlation with an anonymous masquerading agent accessing the site metadata. The unwanted bots were blocked on purpose - yet evidence shows anonymous agents were launched from the same public IP address, which in many cases were /19 and /15 addresses from large address pools - and in some cases consecutive. Nginx logs have been archived since 2025-12-24 and the log format was changed to include CC some weeks after inception. Note that these were contributing to the large anon/metadata counts split out in the Access Life Cycle Graphlets included in Publications Access Graphs [1] The table is the total capture of blocked agents that have accessed the mediawiki farm, though this has background I must draw to the attention of the reader: some agents were initially blocked and then permitted into the farm e.g. perplexity and bing others were blocked after they were detected the remaining were always blocked and yet accessed the farm at some point the filtering on the farm has been modified during this period. Rejected bots are signalled distinctly in the nginx logs, as are the unwanted metadata access, and these signals were used to obtain the IP address captured in the results.

Keywords

Masquerading Bots, Bots, Cognitive Memoisation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average