
About Large language models are increasingly used to draft NIH Data Management Plans (DMPs), but their quality and policy alignment require careful evaluation. This repository contains the code for our systematic assessment of Llama 3.3 and GPT-4.1 using both automated metrics and human expert review. See the project inventory for related resources, including the paper and dataset. Standards followed The overall codebase is organized in alignment with the FAIR-BioRS guidelines. All Python code follows the PEP 8 conventions, including consistent formatting, inline comments, and docstrings. Project dependencies are fully captured in requirements.txt . License This work is licensed under the MIT License. See LICENSE for more information. Feedback and contribution Use GitHub Issues to submit feedback, report problems, or suggest improvements. You can also fork the repository and submit a Pull Request with your changes.
LLM, NIH, evaluation, DMPs, FAIR Data Innovations Hub
LLM, NIH, evaluation, DMPs, FAIR Data Innovations Hub
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
