Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Arte digital post-NFT: procedencia, persistencia, reconocimiento

Authors: Esteban, Juan A.;

Arte digital post-NFT: procedencia, persistencia, reconocimiento

Abstract

Este trabajo propone un marco analítico —procedencia, persistencia y reconocimiento— para pensar el arte digital tras el ciclo especulativo del NFT y el colapso de 2022. El marco no es una construcción especulativa: es la formalización conceptual de criterios aplicados en práctica curatorial, coleccionista e institucional desde 2021. A través de seis casos verificables (cierre de Foundation y migración de la artista romainiti, transición Hic et Nunc–Teia, conservación institucional de Rhizome, adquisición de Centre Pompidou en 2023, canonización en curso de Rafaël Rozendaal, validación distribuida de Bright Moments), el trabajo argumenta que el arte digital opera como problema único, distribuido y articulado entre tres dimensiones que se sostienen o se debilitan mutuamente. Tres estudios complementarios —la reclasificación retrospectiva de alignDRAW (Elman Mansimov, 2015), la canonización institucional sostenida de Refik Anadol y la trayectoria de colapso económico y reutilización paramétrica del CryptoKitty común— ilustran tres modelos paradigmáticos de cómo el campo construye, sostiene o transforma obra reconocible. El trabajo concluye nombrando un desplazamiento institucional en curso: del problema técnico del archivo hacia la pregunta política sobre qué redes blockchain merecen reconocimiento como infraestructura legítima de patrimonio cultural a largo plazo.

Keywords

blockchain, procedencia, fully on-chain, infraestructura cultural, conservación de arte digital, post-NFT, NFT, archivo, canon, arte digital, custodia distribuida, patrimonio histórico NFT, reconocimiento institucional

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!