
Abstract Reasoning in complex, poorly understood domains requires methods that tolerate incompleteness while still preserving progress. Large Language Models (LLMs) are effective exploratory tools, but their stateless and non-authoritative nature leads to repetitive rediscovery and loss of hard-won understanding. This paper introduces Cognitive Memoisation as a lightweight knowledge-engineering pattern that externalises facts, constraints, and invariants into human-governed artefacts. When paired with LLMs, Cognitive Memoisation enables sustained exploratory modelling, prevents Groundhog Day–style rediscovery, and provides a disciplined bridge from early abstraction to later formalisation.
governance, LLM System, Safety, Durable Knowledge, Cognitive Memoisation
governance, LLM System, Safety, Durable Knowledge, Cognitive Memoisation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
