
Modern large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong generative capabilitiesbut remain prone to producing fluent yet factually incorrect outputs. A keylimitation of existing approaches is the absence of an explicit representationof internal reasoning dynamics, with generation and evaluation typicallyoccurring within a single probabilistic process. We introduce theSakshi-Protocol, a control-layer architecture that separates generation,observation, and decision-making through an explicit cognitive state-spacerepresentation. This state-space captures interpretable properties of internalbehavior, including stability, reactivity, transformation, valuation, andintegration.We define a distortion metric over this representation to estimateepistemic instability and guide intervention decisions during inference. Wedemonstrate empirically that internal signals are fundamentally insufficientto detect high-confidence hallucinations, establishing a boundary conditionfor this class of approaches. The framework responds by integratinga distortion-guided external grounding mechanism, selectively invokedwhen epistemic risk is elevated. This enables the system to regulate whenverification is required rather than attempting to directly classify correctness.Evaluation demonstrates that distortion-guided control produces consistentseparation between control regions, while selective grounding reduceshallucination rate and preserves baseline accuracy. These results motivatestate-space modeling and distortion-guided intervention as a principledapproach to improving reliability in LLM systems.
inference-time control, epsitemic uncertainty, LLM reliability, state-space control, large language models, grounding, natural language processing, hallucination detection, artificial intelligence, distortion metric
inference-time control, epsitemic uncertainty, LLM reliability, state-space control, large language models, grounding, natural language processing, hallucination detection, artificial intelligence, distortion metric
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
