Structure class SWA layer Temporal scaleSlow — high persistence across many individual events Primary function Defines the container within which behavioral and frequency dynamics occur Classification test Does this factor define what is possible within a period, rather than what actually occurs? Optimal layer SWA at 99% DC — full rolling coverage without compression Output produced Frequency (value) — cross-mapped to CSA layer by inversion Frame-setting High persistenceRegime-definingSlow-moving Behavior class HCA-s + HCA-f layers bifurcated fulcrum Temporal scale Medium — directional rather than positional; indicates trajectory, not absolute state Primary function Describes directional movement or pressure within a given structure Classification test Does this factor generate directional bias within a regime, rather than defining the regime or instantiating specific values? Self-referential The only class that does not invert — HCA observes behavior and produces bias output, making it the mediating fulcrum between the two outer cross-mapped layers Structural behavior → HCA-s Regime formation, persistence, and transition patterns. PP/BPC domain. Outputs structural bias. Realignment is its embedded frequency shadow. PP/BPC domain Realignment shadow Frequency behavior → HCA-f Probability concentration and distribution within a regime. PCB-F domain. Outputs frequency bias. PRC-OT is its embedded structural shadow. PCB-F domainPRC-OT shadow Frequency class CSA layer Temporal scale Fast — high variance, sensitive to local conditions, concentration-specific Primary function Indicates where within a regime the next event is most likely to concentrate Classification test Does this factor indicate specific outcome values or value concentrations, rather than defining the regime or generating directional pressure? Optimal layer CSA at Anticipation / Inclusion DC — top-k selected from HCA block averages, not raw history Output produced Structure (regime) — cross-mapped to SWA layer by inversion Value-instantiating High varianceConcentration indicatorFast-moving ORACLE-QC foundation stack each layer provides formal grounding to all layers above · select any layer to explore ↑ L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 MMAL multi-modal axiom layer · first principles PACAD pattern-canonical architecture dictionary BLP / LPB + MTIC logic primitives + multi-triadic canonical composition SMC / SCL / SML state-mode canonical · state-class logic · state-mode logic OCME engine pipeline six prediction engines · full operational system ORISOM-F · MM-MC · PCB-F · A/PC · PP/BPC · MP-RP L1 = foundational axioms · L5 = operational output · dashed line = upward formal dependency Operational · L5 OCME — Operational Containment Multi-Engine Definition The six prediction engines operating as an integrated dual-triadic system: ORISOM-F, MM-MC, PCB-F, A/PC, PP/BPC, and MP-RP. The operational output layer — the fully instantiated application of all four foundational layers to empirical prediction tasks. Function in ORACLE-QC Applies the foundational stack to empirical prediction. The SWA/HCA/CSA pipeline, the seven-stage processing pipeline, the dual-triadic engine structure, and the seven-factor analytical framework all operate at this layer. OCME is the formal system in contact with the observable world. Provides to layers above ↑ Nothing — OCME is the topmost layer. But prediction accuracy at this layer feeds back to inform PACAD updates when empirical testing reveals patterns that warrant canonical formalization. L5 is the layer where the stack earns its validity through contact with data. Transformer correspondence Analogous to the model's inference output — but every derivation is formally traceable through SMC/SCL/SML rules, BLP/LPB + MTIC composition, PACAD canonical mappings, and MMAL axioms. The output is not an opaque numerical approximation; it is a formally derivable structural assertion whose reasoning chain can be audited end-to-end. Key property The only layer that directly interfaces with empirical data. Failures at this layer are diagnostically valuable: they can be traced back through L4 (incorrect rule application), L3 (invalid composition), L2 (incorrect canonical form), or L1 (axiom gap). This traceability is what distinguishes ORACLE-QC from statistical inference.