
Modern retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems convert sensitive content into high-dimensional embeddings and store them in vector databases that treat the resulting numerical artifacts as opaque. Major vector-store products do not provide native controls for embedding integrity, ingestion-time distributional anomaly detection, or cryptographic provenance attestation. We show this opens a class of steganographic exfiltration attacks: an attacker with write access to the ingestion pipeline can hide payload data inside embeddings using simple post-embedding perturbations (noise injection, rotation, scaling, offset, fragmentation, and combinations thereof) while preserving the surface-level retrieval behavior the RAG system exposes to legitimate users. We evaluate these techniques across a synthetic-PII corpus on text-embedding-3-large, four locally hosted open embedding models, a cross-corpus replication on BEIR NFCorpus and a Quora subset (over 26,000 chunks combined), seven vector-store configurations, an adaptive-attacker variant of the detector evaluation, and a paraphrased-query retrieval benchmark. Distribution-shifting perturbations are often caught by simple anomaly detectors; small-angle orthogonal rotation defeats distribution-based detection across every (model, corpus) pair tested. A disjoint-Givens rotation encoder gives a closed-form per-vector capacity ceiling of floor(d/2) * b bits, but real embedding manifolds impose a capacity-detectability trade-off, and the retrieval-preserving operating point sits well below it. We propose VectorPin, a cryptographic provenance protocol that pins each embedding to its source content and producing model via an Ed25519 signature over a canonical byte representation. Any post-embedding modification breaks signature verification. Embedding-level integrity is a deployable, standardizable control that closes this attack class.
47 pages, 3 figures. Reference implementations: https://github.com/jaschadub/VectorSmuggle and https://github.com/jaschadub/VectorPin
FOS: Computer and information sciences, embedding store, machine learning security, Cryptography and Security, retrieval-augmented generation, data exfiltration, RAG, Ed25519, anomaly detection, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Machine Learning, Information Retrieval, AI security, RAG security, VectorPin, steganography, cryptographic provenance, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), vector database, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), K.6.5; I.2.7; H.3.3
FOS: Computer and information sciences, embedding store, machine learning security, Cryptography and Security, retrieval-augmented generation, data exfiltration, RAG, Ed25519, anomaly detection, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Machine Learning, Information Retrieval, AI security, RAG security, VectorPin, steganography, cryptographic provenance, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), vector database, Information Retrieval (cs.IR), K.6.5; I.2.7; H.3.3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
