Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Modelled wild boar density estimation

Authors: ENEtwild consortium; Illanas, Sonia; Fernández-López, Javier; Blanco-Aguiar, José Antonio; Warren, Daniel A; Croft, Simon; Smith, Graham C; +2 Authors

Modelled wild boar density estimation

Abstract

Previous studies have used separate regional models of species distribution and abundance to address shifting species–environment relationships. These models, based on hunting yield data, incorporate regional effects and improve reliability, but they often fail to capture continuous spatial gradients. This report evaluates a new approach for modelling gradual spatial changes in wild boar relative abundance using spatially explicit models. We compared downscaled hunting yield predictions from two models—an environmental-only model and a spatially explicit model—with estimates from the ENETWILD consortium (2022). Hunting yields were modelled using a Negative Binomial framework with covariates and a spatial random effect implemented via a Nearest Neighbour Gaussian Process (NNGP), generating predictions on a 10×10 km grid across the species’ range. Model performance was assessed by comparing total predicted harvests, uncertainty (credible vs. confidence intervals), spatial agreement (Spearman correlations), and country-level results for Spain, France, Italy, and Poland to account for differences in data resolution. Results indicate that spatial random-effect models produce smooth continental patterns but are limited by non-stationarity and heterogeneous data resolution, leading to unreliable predictions in areas with coarse or uneven spatial units. Environmental and spatial models capture different aspects of wild boar distribution, underscoring the need to explicitly account for regional variability when modelling at a European scale. The ENETWILD-consortium et al. (2024) model, which calibrates hunting bag data into wild boar density estimates, shows the strongest correlation with independent references and is currently the most reliable option for risk assessments that require spatially explicit wild boar density data. High-resolution hunting statistics are critical for producing realistic spatial patterns; where data resolution is low, models generate unreliable results, whereas areas with improved, high-resolution data yield spatial patterns consistent with ecological expectations.

EU, pdf, biohaw@efsa.europa.eu

Keywords

spatial distribution model, spatial random-effect models, hunting yield, wild boar

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green