Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

SESSION 5: OPENNESS AND METRICS IN THE ACADEMIC SYSTEM

Authors: Williams, Richard;

SESSION 5: OPENNESS AND METRICS IN THE ACADEMIC SYSTEM

Abstract

THE FUTURE OF OPEN RESEARCH: RELIABLE, RESPONSIBLE, EQUITABLE FOR2026 CONFERENCE MAY 4-6, 2026 TUM - INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES BUILDING, GARCHING SESSION 5: OPENNESS AND METRICS IN THE ACADEMIC SYSTEM. Chair: Richard Williams (Technical University of Munich) 1. “Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science? The Prospects of Institutionalizing the Research Values of Openness and Mutual Responsiveness.” Rene Von Schomberg (RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany) 2. “Open Research and Academic Capitalism: Areas of Opposition and Alignment.” Thomas Hostler (Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom) 3. “Beyond Metrics: Qualitative Approaches to Open Research Monitoring in Social Sciences and Humanities.” Maike Neufend, Maaike Duine (Open Research Office Berlin, Berlin, Germany) Maxi Kindling (Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany) 4. “Responsible Open Science: Research Ethics and Integrity in Practice.” Maria Strecht Almeida, Ana Sofia Carvalho (ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal) 5. “Beyond the League Tables: Contesting Global Rankings in the Move Toward Open Research.” Quoc Tan Tran (University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany) Angeliki Tzouganatou (OpenAIRE, Attiki, Greece) 6. “Co-Evaluation for Open Research: Lessons from the #Discussai Think-Ins.” Michael Creek, Marzia Mazzonetto (Stickydot, Brussels, Belgium) [Cancelled] 7. “Enabling A Commons - The Challenges EOSC will Encounter for Equitable Access.” Hugh Shanahan (Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom) 8. “Evidence for Equitable Open Research with the EOSC Open Science Observatory.” Tereza Szybisty (OpenAIRE AMKE, Athens, Greece) 9. “In Trust We Build: Engaging Disciplinary Communities in Service Development - Early Experiences from Base 4NFDI.” Sandra Zänkert (ZBMED – Information Center for Life Sciences, Cologne, Germany) 10. “RIECS - Concept: Shaping Tomorrow's European Research Infrastructure for Excellent Citizen Science” Franziska Stressmann, Carolina Doran, Kai-Ti Wu (European Citizen Science Association (ECSA), Berlin, Germany)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
OpenAIRE