Potentialism Framework (PF) is a proposed framework for making ethical judgment more legible and revisable in context—especially when people disagree, incentives distort reporting, or stakes make “good intentions” an unreliable proxy. PF organizes attention around a small set of terms (defined later in the front matter): potentials (neutral capacities), expressions (what occurs in a moment), and context (the conditions shaping expression). It treats will as the trained capacity to regulate expression, and ethics as the cultivated skill of choosing expressions that are as mutually compatible as possible while reducing avoidable suffering and protecting dignity. PF uses compatibility as an evaluative posture: assessing foreseeable effects on (a) avoidable suffering/harm, (b) dignity of awareness (as a ceiling principle), and (c) others’ freedom to regulate their potentials within real constraints (to a reasonable degree). It treats responsibility as scaling with awareness and power/impact: higher awareness and higher impact carry more obligation to use will in line with ethical insight and to answer for effects. PF is offered as a compass, not a rulebook: it provides concepts and practice scaffolds that can support inquiry, contestation, and revision, without claiming to replace domain evidence, governance, or technical assurance.