Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

FRIDGE Governance - Shared Responsibility and Operational Roles for Trusted Research Environments on AI Supercomputing Infrastructure

Authors: Machin, Tim; Madge, Jim; O'Reilly, Martin; Santos, Luis; Randall, Karen Louise; Craddock, Matt; Chuter, Antony;

FRIDGE Governance - Shared Responsibility and Operational Roles for Trusted Research Environments on AI Supercomputing Infrastructure

Abstract

This paper presents the governance framework developed for FRIDGE (Federated Research Infrastructure by Data Governance Extension), a model that extends Trusted Research Environment (TRE) governance boundaries to large-scale external AI supercomputing infrastructure. FRIDGE provisions an ephemeral satellite TRE as a secure enclave on external compute, bringing it under the control of an existing TRE and its governance framework, removing the need to renegotiate data sharing agreements with hosting providers or data owners. Developed in collaboration with the technical teams at two UK AI Research Resource (AIRR) sites, the Bristol Centre for Supercomputing (BriCS, hosting Isambard-AI) and the University of Cambridge Research Computing Service (hosting Dawn), the paper sets out a Shared Responsibility Model delineating obligations across the FRIDGE Hosting Organisation, TRE Operator Organisation, and Resource Allocator (mapped to the Five Safes framework); a Roles Catalogue covering organisational, governance, technical, and researcher roles across the full operational lifecycle; and lifecycle sequence diagrams documenting cross-boundary handoff points from project initialisation through provisioning, active research use, teardown, and termination. The outputs align with the emerging SATRE 2.0 Federation pillar, constituting an early real-world implementation of federation requirements 5.1.01, 5.1.02, and 5.5.01. The paper also identifies key gaps, most notably the absence of a TRE-aware access call pathway within the current AIRR process, and policy/agreement gaps at AIRR sites, and sets out a roadmap for moving FRIDGE from validated prototype to a production-ready service for sensitive data research.

Keywords

AIRR, federation, Isambard-AI, sensitive data, shared responsibility model, TRE, Data Governance, Trusted Research Environment, Sensitive Data, SATRE, Dawn, AI supercomputing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average