Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This dataset contains the reflected light models used in the analysis of Batalha et al. 2018 (Color Classification of Extrasolar Giant Planets: Prospects and Cautions) . The paper explains the full calculation of the models and the parameter space. The public repository colorcolor contains notebooks that explain how extract spectra from the database. To show it's simplicity, we post a small code snippet below. import colorcolor as c planet_dict = {'cloud': 0.03, 'distance': 0.85, 'gravity': 25, 'metallicity': 0.0, 'phase': 100.0, 'temp': 150} planet = c.select_model(planet_dict) wave, albedo = planet['WAVELN'], planet['GEOMALB'] Further explanation can be found at the GitHub repository and within the paper.
{"references": ["Batalha et al. (2018) Color Classification of Extrasolar Giant Planets: Prospects and Cautions"]}
The authors acknowledge support from the NASA Grant # NNG16PJ24C and Grant # NNX15AJ80G
spectroscopy, planets, wfirst, atmospheres, direct imaging, giant exoplanet, exoplanet
spectroscopy, planets, wfirst, atmospheres, direct imaging, giant exoplanet, exoplanet
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 28 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts