
Axis-aligned boosted trees are strong on tabular data but highly sensitive to feature coordinates. We study learned coordinate preconditioning for budgeted gradient boosted trees, asking how much cumulative tree complexity is required to reach a strong fraction of an unconstrained boosted-tree baseline. On synthetic rotated and lifted tasks, learned coordinates reduce target-prefix complexity from hundreds of leaves to tens while remaining neutral on a tree-native piecewise control. On real continuous datasets, append-style transforms are too easy for trees to ignore; replacing the numeric block with a learned remap is the structural change that makes transfer effective. No single static supervision objective is robust across datasets: probability supervision preserves early geometric gains, whereas teacher-margin supervision mainly improves late fidelity. We therefore introduce a staged probability-to-teacher remap that allocates early boosting rounds to a probability-trained view and later rounds to a teacher-remap view. On a seven-dataset continuous benchmark, the staged recipe achieves the best average complexity-at-target rank among the primary single-recipe baselines. On a frozen four-dataset held-out pack, it matches or improves target-prefix complexity on all four datasets and clipped prefix area on three, with no catastrophic regression against the probability-remap baseline. Mixed-data gains are smaller and less uniform, suggesting that heterogeneous tabular problems need stronger locality or type-aware handling.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
