Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

MULTIDISCIPLINARY DIALOGUE IN MODERN TURKOLOGY

Authors: Huseynova, Leyla Natiq gizi;

MULTIDISCIPLINARY DIALOGUE IN MODERN TURKOLOGY

Abstract

The present article is devoted to a systematic theoretical and methodological investigation of contemporary linguistic issues in modern Turkology. The study aims to analyze the morphosyntactic structure, semantic organization, and functional characteristics of Turkic languages within a comparative-theoretical framework in order to identify their developmental tendencies. Processes of globalization, intensive language contact, and digital communication have led to observable transformations in the structural and semantic systems of Turkic languages. These transformations are particularly reflected in the modification of grammatical patterns, lexical renewal, and the functional expansion of discourse practices. The research is grounded in comparative-historical methodology, structural-semantic analysis, and functional-pragmatic approaches. Furthermore, the establishment of multidisciplinary scientific dialogue in Turkology and the strengthening of academic cooperation among Turkic-speaking communities are substantiated as essential conditions for the conceptual and institutional advancement of the field. The identification of common research directions enables a more objective evaluation of the typological features of Turkic languages. The scientifically grounded assessment of contemporary challenges in Turkic languages requires an integrative and theoretically substantiated approach. Such a framework contributes both to the enrichment of general linguistic theory and to defining the future developmental perspectives of Turkology.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback